Mutual Belief Revision (Preliminary Report)
نویسنده
چکیده
A semantical theory of belief revision in synchronous multi-agent systems is presented. The theory assumes that the world is static, and that the belief revision methods used by the agents are common knowledge. It is shown that the theory has as a special case the revision of knowledge in a broadcast variant of Fagin and Vardi's communicating scientists model, in which knowledge is deened in terms of an equivalence relation on runs in a distributed system. Next, the theory is applied to give a semantic reconstruction of a default logic theory of speech acts proposed by Perrault. This reconstruction characterizes the way the speech act transforms an only knowing representation of the agent's belief states. The results are shown to diier from those obtained by Perrault. In particular , it is argued that a sincere assertion does not necessarily lead to mutual belief of the proposition asserted, even when the hearer does not initially have any beliefs about this proposition.
منابع مشابه
Rational Belief Revision ∗ ( Preliminary Report )
Theories of rational belief revision recently proposed by Alchourrón, Gärdenfors, Makinson, and Nebel illuminate many important issues but impose unnecessarily strong standards for correct revisions and make strong assumptions about what information is available to guide revisions. We reconstruct these theories according to an economic standard of rationality in which preferences are used to se...
متن کاملInterleaving belief revision and reasoning: preliminary report
Most existing work on belief revision and knowledge representation and reasoning tacitly assumes that belief revision is performed off-line, and that reasoning from the beliefs is performed either before or after the beliefs are changed. This imposes that, if a revision occurs while reasoning is performed, reasoning has to be stopped and re-started anew so that the revision is taken into accoun...
متن کاملNegotiation as Mutual Belief Revision
This paper presents an axiomatic approach to negotiation protocol analysis. We consider a negotiation procedure as multiple stages of mutual belief revision. A set of postulates in AGM-style of belief revision are proposed to specify rational behavior of negotiation. An explicit construction of negotiation function is given in which negotiation process is viewed as the interaction of two iterat...
متن کاملMutual Belief Revision: Semantics and Computation
This paper presents both a semantic and a computational model for multi-agent belief revision. We show that these two models are equivalent but serve different purposes. The semantic model displays the intuition and construction of the belief revision operation in multi-agent environments, especially in case of just two agents. The logical properties of this model provide strong justifications ...
متن کاملBelief Change in Reasoning Agents
The capability of changing beliefs upon new information in a rational and efficient way is crucial for an intelligent agent. Belief change therefore is one of the central research fields in Artificial Intelligence (AI) for over two decades. In the AI literature, two different kinds of belief change operations have been intensively investigated: belief update, which deal with situations where th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1994